Theories

Add a Comment

Comment by jf on January 26, 2012 at 20:17

Adonis. you practices the remote vision since 2000. A veteran.

Are you saying that in a remote view session, you percibiste the prediction of the Concorde accident?.

Comment by Asa Jomard on January 26, 2012 at 19:55

Adonis, I am obviosuly not good at this since I only started today. But I will try anything. So I tried a target number at the site you recommened. I saw a beach but it was a skyscraper in Japan! Well, it is cold in my house so maybe I was daydreaming.

Also does this only work with information and facts? I read that everything should be verified in the physical world. But can you see new solutions and ideas? Or do you think it would be possible?

Comment by jf on January 26, 2012 at 14:12

Asa, to give you an example. Remote vision, created that we can access to a kind of universal GPS. In principle it sounds very exciting and mysterious at the same time. You can find enough information on the internet, even show you how to do step has step.

The steps are as follows. Which will explore the world with his conscience, called viewers. It has these people, they are assigned coordinates, and in theory, their perceptions are teletrasportadas automatically to the exact point. These people start has been collecting information about what you are perceiving. For this they use simply a role and a folio.

To give you another example, the coordinates are as the address of the internet, type www.thebonosociety.com. Once you receive this coordinate, then you are travelling to the content of the page. It is basically like the internet.

More than a science, it may be a fictional invention.

But if you report a little, going has been discover that they have developed throughout a procedure that is very interesting, especially if we learn has move that process to the attitude of the thinker.

Comment by jf on January 26, 2012 at 14:00

Adonis, I know the remote vision. It is very interesting, but is not known with certainty if it is real or just fiction. What's more interesting are the protocols that have been designed to lead the perception, the way down in different States, of the brain, such as the alpha, range, beta... I believe that these protocols can be transferred to the attitude of the thinker. In the same way as Edward Bono has designed tools for thinking, remote vision protocols are designed to collect information. I'm quite interested in this topic, I'll follow up.

Comment by Asa Jomard on January 26, 2012 at 8:45

Adonis, what a fascinating video. Do know more about remote perceiving I am sure you do. Are you training yourself? Any tips?

Comment by Franis on December 29, 2011 at 5:14

I really enjoy personality theories - at least this love hyperlink that) you mentioned (that I'm listening to now) is based on brain science...as thinking skills are based on brain science theories as observed by de Bono. My fave is the Conative Index - by Kathy Kolbe. Based on the idea that people have a preferred sensibility of their motives for doing a job a certain way.

Comment by Sinclair McLay on December 12, 2011 at 13:23

Hi Adonis,
From my understanding Keynes theory covered all bases and was the dominant paradigm till the 1970’s. (Keynes is included in De Bono’s 30 Greatest Thinkers.) However the advent of Stagflation – high inflation and high unemployment – in the 70’s proved immune to any Keynsian medicine and was only treatable through Friedmanite Monetarism. It seems like the current situation is being treated by a mishmash of the two – though there is talk of a Keynsian endgame. So in a way there is a need for a new paradigm.

For a new entry point lets return to my PO Money Ha Ha!. This led in my twisted mind anyway to the concept of people being wired up to their own personal Chuckle-O-Meter . The more you laugh the more money you get from a central pool. Could be less taxes or wireless transmissions to the nearest till.
Broadening this out it could be said that of all the inputs to the economic system – interest rates, currencies, wages, capital etc etc – there are inputs that don’t yet exist, but may in an alternative model ( if they can be quantified) and those are feelings.

Comment by Sinclair McLay on December 8, 2011 at 16:32

Adonis
1)People take money too seriously!
2) Maybe the guy is taking himself too seriously
3) What does he mean by extraction?
4) A buck says the next Einstein will appear in the field of Political Economy
5) Two bucks says the solution will be simple and elegant.
6) Wouldn't it be nice to have a little humour in that solution....?
7) PO Money Ha Ha!

Comment by Sana Ullah Khan on October 16, 2011 at 10:23

How Theories and Models/ Framework evolve to Form a Three Kind of Knowledge i.e. Theoretical, Research & Practical Knowledge.....?

Comment by Sana Ullah Khan on October 16, 2011 at 10:20

@ Adonis: In my opinion Idea Should Fall in Less or More Important Extremes instead of Right and Wrong !!!