Club of thought

Add a Comment

Comment by jf on March 26, 2012 at 11:13

I can give you a recent example. I been reading the discussion initiated by Kim Jones on religious thought. There exists no organization, is open for anyone to leave a comment. The result for me is very rare, some members speak of a religion of birds, others like you mention bullfighting ... By the way, the message was one I liked you, where you try to analyze the term "Religion" , this is very interesting. Moreover, I find that few people have offered information on religious thought, and yet has received many comments ... I do not know if Kim himself will be pleased with the outcome.

So, this kind of exploration of a subject can be treated here as well, simply by giving the order of the "free scan" in this order, each member can use the tool you want.
But the group is designed to work together. A if that is normal that all members sobrevolemos the subject with the same tool and in the direction of a common goal.
Suppose we decided to explore the subject of religion with the yellow hat. Then all the members choose the yellow hat and write their results in the specific discussion (this is important to have an order, there must be a definite place).
A single member can have many results on the yellow hat. But the results are few in comparison to the overall result of all members.

Conclusion;

The idea behind having this group can be transferred to individual blogs...
But in this group, it was decided the target computer. IN individual blogs, we decided the issue on an individual basis. And then the individual blogs are open to free exploration. In this group, requires a discussion of the scanning procedure.

I do not know if it has become clear.

For example. When you open a blog with a title, put the above example .. "religious thinking". Just with this title, you're marking the target area of ??exploration ... The normal is that people do not go off topic. That is, if the title of the blog is about the religious issue, it is normal that I send comments related to the football game I saw last night. Or the brand of shampoo I'm using to shower ... This is not normal. Normally I talk about something related to religious thought.
However, there is room to make my comment, because no one makes me rules. Then I can give me the freedom to write the entire Bible completed, if necessary. Because no one makes the area "as" can perform this scan. But, receiving many comments, or that these comments are very argued, means that the result is better?. I think not.

Moreover, working together you can learn from other members using their tools. Suppose that one thing. You and I began to explore the same subject. We both agree we explore it with a hat on set, in this case no matter what color, is just one example. When it comes time to show results...;

Suppose you write 7 results ...
And I, only found 1 result.
Why this difference?. If we are using the same tools, why you have found more results than me? .. The procedure must be the same?.
It is here where you can learn from other people.

And indeed, the sum is the overall result, in this case, our super-result is an 8 results.

Comment by jf on March 26, 2012 at 11:11

I think the main difference is that it is designed to move in groups.
When you open a blog on your own, do not need to hear from anyone. In this group, you need a vote and win the majority.
This can produce a result beneficial to society. If we need to agree, then the members will not continue sending issues on their own. Then the content is reduced here.

On the other hand, "individual blogs do not have an organization" just exposes a title under a description and opens to the public to begin to leave comments, "some of these comments have nothing to do with the title of the blog, only make enlarge the content, and for people like me, is quite upset about that do nothing but distract from the main theme".

In this group, as previously thought computer has to scan the selected target. We can select the scan will be with the six hats, then nobody is talking about something else that is out of the six hats.

Imagine a group of members use the same tool of thought to see a theme ... Finally draw results and these results at the same time are stored in one place, all come together at the end to remove a "Super-result" , the sum of all the results of the members.

In addition, this group is of course being tested. Surely there to make adjustments in the organization, in case some day let fly the group. For now it is like a plane that is stored in the garage. I designed a little some grassroots organization, something we can use to start. Then, if members believe it necessary, may make further adjustments to completely change the rules. It's just stiff at first, because if there is stiffness, no one will agree.

Comment by jf on March 26, 2012 at 11:04

Not at all. I do not see on blogs or forums, all participants choose the same tool. This not see it. At least not as much as I would like to see it. On the other hand, we are simply questioning, in philosophical plan. Not in creative practice.

The only difference to the rest of the internet, is that sometimes we use strange expressions, which here are justified by that certain features some tools allow us to say terrible things without others label us insane members, such as word function PO . I think this is the only difference in this web site, compared to the rest of the Internet.

So we can make even more difference with the rest of the internet if we like the birds flying in droves ... They fly in flocks of birds combined .. That is, if we explore the issues with the same tools as a team ... as is being proposed here.

^ ^

A submission? .. Well, you know a way to do this otherwise?. I proposed this initiative. I do not even have put into practice to see if it works or not.
There is a submission on my part, although I am the owner of this group. I do not know it any other way. Again, you know a better way?.

Comment by jf on March 6, 2012 at 12:26

Ok Asa. The latter link seems perfect. I sign .:)).

Comment by Asa Jomard on March 6, 2012 at 12:18

Thanks Juan!

No you do not have to read the book to participate.

But it is nice if everyone looks are the book review .

In fact, a mixture of people who has and has not read a book is always good.

Comment by jf on March 6, 2012 at 12:17

By way of advice. The member Asa, to use a theme that has just started in the society of Bono. Then contains no comments yet.

I prefer to use themes already discussed in the past in this society. These issues contain a certain number of comments. Then you can explore.
To make a second observation of the same subject. But this time, all united and organized in the same direction.
Thus, we also put into practice the tools. And if they register new members may participate. I think it can be very good learning tools, watching them in action with the practice of all members.

Note; Again, this is just a tip. My own suggestion. But you can suggest how to do things in a better and more effective.

Comment by jf on March 6, 2012 at 12:07

Excellent Asa!.

 

; I like that you have saved the order of procedure, and the comments in an orderly fashion, leaving spaces and placing numbers. Thank you very much

 

; also be thankful that you have left nearly a month in advance. Warn in advance is important.

 

; But, I found a problem in you proposal, it is necessary to have read the book to participate in exploration. I have not read. : ((.

 

 I think it is convenient to perform an initial scan to see if the mechanism works well or well need to do some modification. Surely we have to make some improvements

I hope the other members if they have read. Now it's wait for comments from members who want to participate.

Where there is mutual agreement by a few members, (there is no figure given), I will initiate the second phase.

The second phase is to open a discussion with the name of your target, so that members leave your comments there,

Remember, once you start the second phase, the comments are directed to the debate and not here.

Comment by Asa Jomard on March 6, 2012 at 9:10

Dear Members in the Thinkers' Club,

Phase 1.
1. "WHAT" "How to Have a Beautiful Mind"
2. "HOW" Six Hat Thinking framework
3. "WHEN" the first week in April, i.e. 01/04/12 - 08//04/12.

Looking forward to everyone's participation and to Phase 2.
Thanks Juan for organising this!

Comment by jf on March 5, 2012 at 15:15

Welcome to all the members!

.

The member Ruth opened a debate. To open a discussion must first pass through the first phase. The debate begins when the first phase is completed. Unfortunately, the member Ruth skipped all the phases. Please, if I dedicated some time to organize a group under rules, try to keep the order of procedure.
This has forced me to react. I have hidden the option to open discussions.

I think it is urgent that we begin an initial examination to serve as an example to future members.

To select a theme, I think it is appropriate that the debate is on inactive status today. And have a certain number of comments.

I been taking a look at the debates published and called my attention to this debate. I suggest the first "WHAT"

The Happiness Purpose (book by de Bono)

If the members agree. Then he has to go to the second step of the first phase. That is, the second step is to select the tool that we use.

You can propose anything else. But remember to keep the order, please.

PHASE 1;

1) Propose the "WHAT", the theme with the name of your title and a link.

2) Propose the "HOW", to use tools (PMI, Six hats ... etc)

3) Propose the "WHEN". On that date the members want to conduct this exploration. It may be a given day. You can take a week ... etc..

As for the second phase. You do not worry now for the second phase.
I will explain at the appropriate time the procedure for moving from one phase to another.

Any questions, send me a personal message to my profile.