Tags:
Permalink Reply by Phil Bachmann on August 20, 2009 at 4:00
Permalink Reply by William Jack Jordan on November 2, 2009 at 2:22 How much is it !!
Kim Jones said:Thinking Training said:If we all communicated by universally understood "code" would we become rather humourless robotic-types?"
Not unless we were also zombies without self-referential awareness. A bleak world it would be indeed without humour, much of which arises from things you describe such as the way the mind gives up sometimes on auditory patterns it fails to recognise.
We could a have a "Humour code." Humour codes would signal that what follows is a leg pull, for the sheer fun of a leg pull. Somehow, I fear that this might spoil the humour though? Why I rarely use smilies and other emoticons, because - pratfalls of email acknowledged - if you have to tell someone you are using humour then it kind of weakens the effect, doesn't it? Surely jokes work most effectively when they detonate suddenly, like a landmine, or a wet fart during hymn-singing in church?
"Emma Chissett?" the woman said to the sales assistant
"No, my name's Sally. I don't think we have an Emma here."
"No - Emma Chissett!?" the woman faintly demanded once again this time pointing to a book.
"Umm....nooo, that book is by Emily Dickenson"
"Emma Chissett???" the woman this time seemed quite frustrated
What was the woman saying?
Permalink Reply by B Ashley on December 24, 2009 at 14:43 Angela King said:How much is it !!
Kim Jones said:Thinking Training said:If we all communicated by universally understood "code" would we become rather humourless robotic-types?"
Not unless we were also zombies without self-referential awareness. A bleak world it would be indeed without humour, much of which arises from things you describe such as the way the mind gives up sometimes on auditory patterns it fails to recognise.
We could a have a "Humour code." Humour codes would signal that what follows is a leg pull, for the sheer fun of a leg pull. Somehow, I fear that this might spoil the humour though? Why I rarely use smilies and other emoticons, because - pratfalls of email acknowledged - if you have to tell someone you are using humour then it kind of weakens the effect, doesn't it? Surely jokes work most effectively when they detonate suddenly, like a landmine, or a wet fart during hymn-singing in church?
"Emma Chissett?" the woman said to the sales assistant
"No, my name's Sally. I don't think we have an Emma here."
"No - Emma Chissett!?" the woman faintly demanded once again this time pointing to a book.
"Umm....nooo, that book is by Emily Dickenson"
"Emma Chissett???" the woman this time seemed quite frustrated
What was the woman saying?
I have heard this woman who taking in the Strine language.
She was from the land of
terror souses
Gloria Sara Titch
egg nishes
etc.
Popular phrases include:
gunga din
aorta
zarf trawl
etc.
Permalink Reply by Sinclair McLay on February 23, 2011 at 9:55 If we are addicted to bad news - there's no news like bad news - then a positive news outlet/agency may be a step too far. (Yes we may well be that degraded!)
So how about a halfway house - PMI News?
PMI News would carry not just positive, but minus and intersesting aspects of the topics of the day. (One proviso might be that finding the immediate positive in henious or tragic stories may be insensitive)
Following the 30 min PMI News how about a 30 min Six Hat on any topic- or topics - covered or point raised. Could be interesting!
Of course OPV springs to mind as well - Dennis you're in the tool shed (!) - anything else that could be added without over complicating?
Permalink Reply by Gijs van Beeck Calkoen on May 21, 2011 at 10:57
Permalink Reply by Gijs van Beeck Calkoen on June 3, 2011 at 11:56
Permalink Reply by Gijs van Beeck Calkoen on December 26, 2011 at 15:04 I just found another Positive News Site Dowser
About
Think of five problems facing the world.
Now think of five solutions.
If you found the first easier than the second, don’t worry. Everybody does.
We know much more about what’s broken than what’s being done to fix things.
We created Dowser to address this imbalance.
We’re living through a global social change renaissance. Millions of people are building organizations and social enterprises, attacking problems with new ideas and models.
But most of this activity is hidden. The news is better at telling us what went wrong yesterday than what’s being done to make tomorrow better.
At Dowser, we present the world through a ‘solution frame,’ rather than a ‘problem frame.’ We’re interested in the practical and human elements of social innovation: Who’s solving what and how. We want to know how people come up with ideas, how they put them into practice, how they pay the bills, and what fuels their fire.
We don’t proselytize, provide feel good news, or celebrate a few heroes. We provide trustworthy news and provocative ideas with a discerning eye.
We’re open to any sector – nonprofit, business, government. And we’re interested in social innovators of any age in any field. We’ll be starting with stories in the U.S. and Canada. Later, we’ll expand globally. #
Dowser is a place for anyone who cares about initiating positive change. We tell stories about people who are creatively attacking social problems. People who show how achievable it is to make an impact.
A dowser uses a divining rod to uncover water. We uncover stories of change.
Dowser is a work-in-progress. We’d love to hear what you think.
Permalink Reply by Kim Jones on December 27, 2011 at 0:06 Definitely a site to bookmark and return to often. Excellent, Gijs. Some of the new schemes in the US for people in the retirement age group to avoid defining the golden years as endless rounds of golf and Saturday night bingo tournaments struck me as worthwhile. How to redesign yourself for increasingly competitive employment purposes in an ageing and ageist society.
© 2013 Created by Administrator.
Powered by